Timmins Hostile Bid for Capital Gold – How much are they really paying?

As this bid has now turned hostile, and given Timmins has now increased their cash offer to $0.25 per Capitlal Gold share, and will need to take on additional debt and dilution to meet expenditures. I have decided to objectively determine how much value is in this merger to ensure Timmins shareholders are not paying too much. My findings below –

Timmins 2011 Expenditures (ex. Tax)

$21m Drilling program, $6.14m Capital expenditure at San Francisco, $2.55m Property option payments, $10m Gammon cancellation fee, $10m Merger transaction costs, $ 15.7m Cash payment in consideration to Capital Gold shareholders

Other – Estimated 6668 gold ounce loan still payable to Sprott. This is deducted in combined cash flow. No other significant liabilities.

Capital Gold Corp 2011 Expenditures (ex. Tax)

$30 m Capital expenditure (not clear at present if the entire balance is for El Chante only?).

Other – No significant other liabilities. Current cash balance can safely cover current liabilities. No significant long term liabilities.

Total => $95.4m

Combined Entity 2011 Cash flow

Calculations assume a base case scenario

San francisco 95k ounces @ $500 cash cost / ounce;  El Chante 65k ounces @ $500 / ounce => $152m. There is also an estimated 6668 ounce gold loan repayable to Sprott. Therefore, adjusted combined entity cash flow => $142m (2012 => $152m).

Financing

Okay, now I am going to conclude that Timmins will go all out with the financing. For argument sake, we will assume half Equity financing (at $2.40, with one half warrant for every share of the combined entity), and half debt (non convertible). Sprott has already agreed $20m financing.

Total Capital requirements => $95.4m.

Equity financing needs = $47.7m. 19.9m shares + 9.95 warrants.

Debt financing needs = $47.7m (inc. $20m arranged financing from Sprott).

Combined F/D entity shares outstanding => 145,111,661 + (62,871,000*2.27) + 19.9m + 9.95m  => 320m.

Combined F/D entity market capitalisation @ $2.40 (60 day Timmins average share price  => $768m.

Estimated combined entity Enterprise value => (F/D Market Cap = $768m) + $47.7m Debt – $35.3m cash from options/warrants if exercised => $780m.

(Assumes all cash equivalents are reserved for Capex / transaction and other expenditures listed above).

Projected Enterprise value after consideration of 2011 cash flow ($142m), interest payments @ 10% ($4.77m), and income tax @ 30% ($23.2m) => $780m – ($142m -$4.77m – $23.2m) => $666m.


Summary – As the above shows, we could expect an enterprise value of $666m by year end. This would give an EV/CF of 4.38x. Given most mid tiers are trading in the 7 – 11 range, we could reasonably expect the share price to double within one year post merger. Possibly by year end, if we experience the usual autumn/winter gold stock bullishness!

As for reserves, we have a combined 2.2m gold ounce P+P, and a total of approximately 2.5m gold ounces M+I at the producing mines. The projected enterprise value is certainly not excessive in relation to reserves and resources. It is also reasonable to expect increased reserves by year end given Timmins current $21m drilling program.

Caveat Emptor (Buyer beware!) It is common for post merger stocks to sell off due to the perceived reduced value of the combined company (transaction costs incurred, acquired company purchased at a premium, management conflicts etc..) and those selling once they have received their cash payment. Therefore, be cautious when buying. I will only accumulate more of these on weakness to reduce post merger sell off risks.

About Jas Rattan

Precious metals and resource stock investor and tader. Also a (wannabe) futures trader.
This entry was posted in Timmins Gold Corp (TMM.v). Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Timmins Hostile Bid for Capital Gold – How much are they really paying?

  1. Haoda says:

    Keep pumping, deleted your DEER, laugh my ass off, lol

  2. Jas Rattan says:

    I should probably avoid Chinese growth stocks though, frauds or not.

  3. Cloud says:

    Yes you should Jas, look at CAGC, it will go to zero eventually. Btw, any updates on CPN? It was even going down when the whole PM sector rally today 😦

    • Jas Rattan says:

      Hi Cloud

      I personally do not believe DEER is an outright fraud. I have seen all the Blogsphere arguments about the overpayment and misappropriation of land transaction funds, and the fact that hardly anyone in China has heard of DEER (are you surprised in a country of 1.3 Billion no one has heard of a tiny $350m company? I’m not!).

      However, I got out as the damage has already been done and will take a long time to repair. If their CEO and founder and largest shareholder really did misapportion $6 million on a land transaction, the company is still doing bloody well! (CEO brought up $2m stock, and paying a divy). I’ve seen management in small cap western companies do worse, yet it doesn’t come to anyones attention!

      CPN – I like very much. I don’t think this company is marketing itself very well. However, they do have a top CEO, former CEO of A.C.A Howe, and a current director at Yamana Gold. Now, a few investment banks brought a load of CPN shares in a brought deal financing (meaning they have actually gone long CPN) at $0.55 last quarter. Brought deal financing’s are usually done at a sharp discount too. This alone gives me confidence.

      To give you an idea of the potential of CPN, do some due dilligence of Gabrielle Resources (GBU.TO). Their Romanian project is trading at about $180 ounce. If you price it up, it’s almost as if the market hasn’t even included CPN’s Romanian project’s 6m AuEq ounces in the ground!

      I could happilly be holding CPN for many years 🙂

Leave a comment